Judicial Errors

Summary

This book is more than just a personal testimony: it is a powerful indictment of a justice system that claims to act “in the name of the people” while disregarding those it is supposed to protect.

Through the account of twenty years of proceedings, the author demonstrates how repeated serious errors, the misuse of jurisprudence, and the absence of fair recourse expose the dysfunctions of an institution that has become a closed fortress of magistrates. What should embody democracy ends up resembling a denial of justice.

The book appeals to all citizens: how can justice pronounce rulings in the name of the people while showing such contempt for them? This essential question is asked not only through one man’s ordeal but also through a broader political and societal analysis. The text shows that when laws are not applied and jurisprudence replaces legislation, the very foundation of democracy is at risk.

Critiques

Written in a clear, incisive, and accessible style, the book alternates between legal analysis, personal narrative, and citizen reflection. It addresses readers who want to understand how justice functions in reality, beyond official speeches, and why its dysfunctions fuel mistrust and even strengthen extremist temptations.

Already compared by several readers to investigative works and civic essays, the book is also a call for reform: giving more power back to the people, involving citizens’ associations in judicial oversight, and questioning the philosophy taught at the National School for the Judiciary.

With this testimony, the author positions himself as both a witness and a citizen committed to democracy. His fight is echoed by the association *En Quête de Justice*, which campaigns for reforms and has initiated petitions and legal actions to denounce these abuses.

👉 This book is aimed at anyone who refuses resignation and believes that democracy cannot survive without a fair, impartial, and accountable justice system